FAQ

Music talk

New track - Tides of Fire

Reply to topic

Post new topic

Goto page Previous 1, 2

G3ronimo
Hot & Sexeh

Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Location: The Netherlands, Wezep

Posted: Wed Mar 28 2007 18:50

Psalm 97 wrote:

DISCLAIMER: Please excuse this ignorant question from a rank newbie. Embarassed

G3ronimo wrote:

hah great melodies seriously Very Happy

its superb, I luv the guitar
but please start using VSTS, your tracking skills are great Cool

Why do you insist on VSTs? Are they better quality sound than samples and soundfonts? I thought they were supposed to sound more synthetic, and therefore not be as good.

euh VSTS are awesome Razz

www.soundsector.net

Psalm 97
Registered User

Joined: 24 Dec 2006

Posted: Thu Mar 29 2007 15:32
I was hoping for a little more detail chief. How are they awesome, why are they to be preferred over wav and soundfont?
Only what is done for Christ will last.

Elijah
Registered User

Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada Eh?

Posted: Thu Mar 29 2007 15:59

Psalm 97 wrote:

I was hoping for a little more detail chief. How are they awesome, why are they to be preferred over wav and soundfont?

when you use samples say its made on the note of C.

when you play an f or something, it loses some quality, and as well if it had a filter on it like one with some attack, it would not match up with the other samples...

here is a very drastic comparison, usually people take more care, but still...

this is triangle 2 vst

This is The VSTi Version

This is The Sampled Version - I sampled One note in C

as you can see the samples dont match up, but since the VST synthesizes live, then all the parts add up.
this is very crude since people would often sample many different notes and put it in an instrument pack, but... a vst is typaclly 2 MB maybe and a the array of samplepacks would def. be more resource intensive.

and as for registration, jsut do it, its not a matter of saying 'oh its just this one song' i mean, you made this song in MT so pay your respects to yannick and all the others by just regg'n the program, plus then your name will have 'registered user' under it. Laughing

Otherwise, you do what the rest of us brokeasses did, strap a 1/8" cable from one computer to the other. haha

- Elijah

Psalm 97
Registered User

Joined: 24 Dec 2006

Posted: Thu Mar 29 2007 22:34
Ewwwww, no! Playing in MT and recording through a second soundcard is not on, not good quality at all! While export to wav is stellar, playback within MT is kinda plastic sounding. Plus you will inevitably get some background noise, however faint, while playing it. Eeeeeewwwwww!
Only what is done for Christ will last.

DoGmA
User

Joined: 26 Mar 2007

Posted: Thu Mar 29 2007 22:52

Psalm 97 wrote:

Ewwwww, no! Playing in MT and recording through a second soundcard is not on, not good quality at all! While export to wav is stellar, playback within MT is kinda plastic sounding. Plus you will inevitably get some background noise, however faint, while playing it.

Eeeeeewwwwww!

all depending on how good the output of your hardware is Wink

after all it�s only an emergency-solution, for i need it very urgent, and i�m a little bit crestfallen, that nobody, can do this once 4 me.

well stuff it, one day i�m gonna buy the renderer anyway.

however, the next song�s coming soon, this time either kinda aggressive breakbeat or a real fat trance track. whish me afflatus, to do a good job!

greez